Guild · Texas · BBS 2025 Release · 1966–2024

Aerial Insectivores In Texas

32 species in this guild. As a group they are -7%Guild trendA mean-index aggregate across the species in this group — the structural direction of the guild, with individual-species noise smoothed out.Full methodology → since 1969.

Guild SignalsNotable signalsLong-arc shifts the engine flags automatically — sustained declines or increases large enough to stand out from year-to-year noise.Full methodology →

No notable trend signals for aerial insectivores in Texas. See the full index history below.

Aerial Insectivores In Texas Population Forecast

If the recent trend holds, Aerial insectivores in Texas is projected to rise about 20% by 2029 — from 3.4 in 2024 to a central estimate of 4.1 (95% range 2.6–5.6). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±55.1%, with 20% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.

If the recent trend holds, Aerial insectivores in Texas is projected to rise about 20% by 2029 — from 3.4 in 2024 to a central estimate of 4.1 (95% range 2.6–5.6). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±55.1%, with 20% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.19672029
Projection of the recent trend (dashed) with 80/95% bands — a projection, not a prediction. Habitat, climate, and land use are not modeled.
YearProjected indexProjected indexThe central forecast of the abundance index if the recent trend continues. A projection of the current trajectory, not a prediction.Full methodology →95% low95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →95% high95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →
20254.12.65.6
20264.12.65.6
20274.12.65.6
20284.12.65.6
20294.12.65.6

Member Species In Texas

Aerial insectivores species in Texas.
TrendPercent change in the route-weighted abundance index between a smoothed baseline window and the most recent one. It tracks direction, not absolute population.Full methodology →
White-throated SwiftApodidae-94%
Bank SwallowHirundinidae-92%
Chimney SwiftApodidae-83%
Tree SwallowHirundinidae-83%
Common PoorwillCaprimulgidae-83%
Eastern KingbirdTyrannidae-71%
Eastern Wood-PeweeTyrannidae-65%
Common NighthawkCaprimulgidae-62%
Common PauraqueCaprimulgidae-61%
Violet-green SwallowHirundinidae-55%
Scissor-tailed FlycatcherTyrannidae-55%
Cassin's KingbirdTyrannidae-39%
Great Crested FlycatcherTyrannidae-37%
Chuck-will's-widowCaprimulgidae-33%
Acadian FlycatcherTyrannidae-26%
Lesser NighthawkCaprimulgidae-24%
Say's PhoebeTyrannidae-2%
Western Wood-PeweeTyrannidae+2%
Purple MartinHirundinidae+8%
Black PhoebeTyrannidae+23%
Brown-crested FlycatcherTyrannidae+45%
Cliff SwallowHirundinidae+65%
Northern Rough-winged SwallowHirundinidae+84%
Eastern PhoebeTyrannidae+89%
Ash-throated FlycatcherTyrannidae+118%
Great KiskadeeTyrannidae+148%
Vermilion FlycatcherTyrannidae+189%
Barn SwallowHirundinidae+281%
Cave SwallowHirundinidae+410%
Tropical KingbirdTyrannidae+471%
Western KingbirdTyrannidae+824%
Couch's KingbirdTyrannidae+852%

Source: USGS North American Breeding Bird Survey, retrieved 2026-05-22.