Species · BBS 2025 Release · 1966–2024

Purple Martin

Purple Martin has declined: down 44% on the route-weighted index since 1968.

-44%Since 1968
2,442Routes
58Years Surveyed

About the Purple Martin

The largest North American swallow, the Purple Martin in the East nests almost entirely in human-supplied colony houses and gourds.

Size
7.5–8 in long, about 1.8 oz (19–20 cm, 50 g)
Habitat
Open airspace over fields, water and towns; nests in cavities, earthen banks or on structures.
Diet
Flying insects caught high on the wing.
Range
Recorded on 2,442 Breeding Bird Survey routes across 46 states, most concentrated in the Southeastern Coastal Plain.
Family
Hirundinidae · Aerial insectivores
Conservation
Least Concern

Notable Purple Martin Trends

No notable trend signals for Purple Martin. See the full index history below.

Purple Martin Population Forecast

If the recent trend holds, Purple Martin is projected to fall about 24% by 2029 — from 3.9 in 2024 to a central estimate of 3.0 (95% range 1.8–4.1). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±9.1%, with 100% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.

-24%Change by 2029
3.0Projected 2029 index
1.84.195% range
±9.1%Backtest error
19662029
Projection of the recent trend (dashed) with 80/95% bands — a projection, not a prediction. Habitat, climate, and land use are not modeled.
YearProjected index95% low95% high
20253.11.94.3
20263.11.94.2
20273.01.84.2
20283.01.84.2
20293.01.84.1

Where the Purple Martin Is Detected

BBS routes recording Purple Martin, sized by most recent count.

Purple Martin Population Trend by State

Purple Martin population trend by state.
Alabama-51%1968108
Arizona+401%197030
Arkansas-78%196957
California-57%197053
Colorado+15%198825
Connecticut-22%197312
Delaware+962%196817
Florida-9%1968117
Georgia-20%1968110
Illinois-44%1968100
Indiana+38%196864
Iowa-26%196935
Kansas+61%196948
Kentucky+73%196863
Louisiana-25%1969100
Maine-60%197322
Maryland+79%196871
Massachusetts13×197511
Michigan-92%196882
Minnesota-83%196968
Mississippi-55%196869
Missouri+118%196993
Montanainsufficient datan/a3
Nebraska+1%196927
New Hampshire-57%19687
New Jersey-58%196839
New Mexico-65%197021
New York-70%196866
North Carolina-15%196896
North Dakota+241%196931
Ohio-27%196880
Oklahoma-31%196958
Oregon+228%197324
Pennsylvania-58%1968107
Rhode Island-6%19683
South Carolina-59%196850
South Dakota-52%196913
Tennessee+50%196852
Texas+8%1969184
Utah-63%197316
Vermont-71%19698
Virginia-43%196865
Washington+74%198214
West Virginia-66%196837
Wisconsin-89%196884
Wyominginsufficient datan/a2

Purple Martin Population Trend by Region

Bird Conservation Regions are the ecological unit for trends.

Purple Martin population trend by Bird Conservation Region.
Northern Pacific Rainforest-13%197050
Great Basin-45%198212
Northern Rockies-44%19985
Prairie Potholes-34%196974
Boreal Hardwood Transition-98%196883
Lower Great Lakes / St. Lawrence Plain-31%196871
Atlantic Northern Forest-79%196838
Southern Rockies / Colorado Plateau-45%197051
Shortgrass Prairie-80%197713
Central Mixed Grass Prairie-11%196977
Edwards Plateau+391%197120
Oaks and Prairies+66%196974
Eastern Tallgrass Prairie-27%1968259
Prairie Hardwood Transition-72%1968143
Central Hardwoods+108%1968164
West Gulf Coastal Plain / Ouachitas-61%1969105
Mississippi Alluvial Valley+18%196870
Southeastern Coastal Plain-24%1968340
Appalachian Mountains-64%1968272
Piedmont-36%1968167
New England / Mid-Atlantic Coast+94%1968130
Peninsular Florida+39%196872
Coastal California+14%197129
Sonoran and Mojave Deserts-92%19776
Sierra Madre Occidental+170%197024
Chihuahuan Desert-11%197910
Tamaulipan Brushlands+142%196924
Gulf Coastal Prairie+53%196948

Purple Martin Conservation Status

Least Concern

The IUCN Red List rates this species as Least Concern. Our route-weighted index shows it down about 44% since 1968. Aerial insectivores have fallen sharply across the continent, a decline widely linked to dwindling insect prey.

Source: USGS North American Breeding Bird Survey, retrieved 2026-05-22. Trend is a route-weighted relative-abundance index, not an absolute population.