BirdAnalyst
Species · Michigan · BBS 2026 Release · 1966–2025

Purple Martin Population Trend in Michigan

All statesAerial insectivores

Purple Martin in Michigan has collapsed: down 87% on the route-weighted index since 1968.

-87%Since 1968TrendPercent change in the route-weighted abundance index between a smoothed baseline window and the most recent one. It tracks direction, not absolute population.Full methodology →
82Routes In StateSurvey routesHow many standard-protocol BBS routes contributed counts. More routes means a steadier, better-sampled index; very thin coverage is suppressed.Full methodology →
59YearsYears surveyedNumber of years with at least one standard-protocol run in this geography. A longer record makes the trend more reliable.Full methodology →

Notable Purple Martin Trends in MichiganNotable signalsLong-arc shifts the engine flags automatically — sustained declines or increases large enough to stand out from year-to-year noise.Full methodology →

long arc declinecomputed indexTrend sourceWhether the figure is our own computed route-weighted index or an official USGS modeled estimate. The current build labels every trend as computed.Full methodology →

Purple Martin has collapsed in Michigan: down 87% on the route-weighted index since 1968.

Purple Martin Population Forecast in Michigan

If the recent trend holds, Purple Martin in Michigan is projected to fall about 100% by 2030 — from 0.66 in 2025 to a central estimate of 0.00 (95% range 0.00–1.5). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±300.9%, with 100% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.

-100%Change by 2030TrendPercent change in the route-weighted abundance index between a smoothed baseline window and the most recent one. It tracks direction, not absolute population.Full methodology →
0.00Projected 2030 indexProjected indexThe central forecast of the abundance index if the recent trend continues. A projection of the current trajectory, not a prediction.Full methodology →
0.00–1.595% range95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →
±300.9%Backtest errorBacktest errorTypical error when we hold out the most recent years, forecast them, and compare to what actually happened. Lower means a more trustworthy projection.Full methodology →
If the recent trend holds, Purple Martin in Michigan is projected to fall about 100% by 2030 — from 0.66 in 2025 to a central estimate of 0.00 (95% range 0.00–1.5). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±300.9%, with 100% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.19662030
Projection of the recent trend (dashed) with 80/95% bands — a projection, not a prediction. Habitat, climate, and land use are not modeled.
YearProjected indexProjected indexThe central forecast of the abundance index if the recent trend continues. A projection of the current trajectory, not a prediction.Full methodology →95% low95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →95% high95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →
20260.000.001.5
20270.000.001.5
20280.000.001.5
20290.000.001.5
20300.000.001.5

Purple Martin Survey Routes in Michigan

Routes recording Purple Martin in Michigan.
Recent countThe raw number of individuals recorded on this route in its most recent survey year. A single-route tally, not a trend.Full methodology →
Holt1420251972
Brocky Lake1219801980
Mottville1220181967
Skeels919811966
Gibbs City819791979
Prattville720211967
Pettysville719791969
Crystal Fls619921979
Creighton619801979
Hartland620011992
Tahquamenon519801974
Galesburg520251966
Shingleton419811967
Raco419741971
Pickford419941976
Oberlin419861973
Ola419921974
Hamtramck419821978
Rochester420252012
Cunard319921973
Lake City319761970
Fowlerville319901974
Beaver Lake320111972
Tyre319921967
Chippewa Lk.320251994

Purple Martin Population Trend in Other States

alabamaarizonaarkansascaliforniacoloradoconnecticutdelawarefloridageorgiaillinoisindianaiowakansaskentuckylouisianamainemarylandmassachusettsminnesotamississippimissourimontananebraskanew-hampshirenew-jerseynew-mexiconew-yorknorth-carolinanorth-dakotaohiooklahomaoregonpennsylvaniarhode-islandsouth-carolinasouth-dakotatennesseetexasutahvermontvirginiawashingtonwest-virginiawisconsinwyoming

Source: USGS North American Breeding Bird Survey, retrieved 2026-08-14.