Guild · Michigan · BBS 2025 Release · 1966–2024

Aerial Insectivores In Michigan

19 species in this guild. As a group they are -26%Guild trendA mean-index aggregate across the species in this group — the structural direction of the guild, with individual-species noise smoothed out.Full methodology → since 1968.

Guild SignalsNotable signalsLong-arc shifts the engine flags automatically — sustained declines or increases large enough to stand out from year-to-year noise.Full methodology →

No notable trend signals for aerial insectivores in Michigan. See the full index history below.

Aerial Insectivores In Michigan Population Forecast

If the recent trend holds, Aerial insectivores in Michigan is projected to fall about 13% by 2029 — from 2.1 in 2024 to a central estimate of 1.8 (95% range 1.0–2.6). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±3.4%, with 100% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.

If the recent trend holds, Aerial insectivores in Michigan is projected to fall about 13% by 2029 — from 2.1 in 2024 to a central estimate of 1.8 (95% range 1.0–2.6). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±3.4%, with 100% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.19662029
Projection of the recent trend (dashed) with 80/95% bands — a projection, not a prediction. Habitat, climate, and land use are not modeled.
YearProjected indexProjected indexThe central forecast of the abundance index if the recent trend continues. A projection of the current trajectory, not a prediction.Full methodology →95% low95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →95% high95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →
20252.01.22.8
20261.91.12.7
20271.91.12.7
20281.91.12.7
20291.81.02.6

Member Species In Michigan

Aerial insectivores species in Michigan.
TrendPercent change in the route-weighted abundance index between a smoothed baseline window and the most recent one. It tracks direction, not absolute population.Full methodology →
Purple MartinHirundinidae-92%
Cliff SwallowHirundinidae-66%
Willow FlycatcherTyrannidae-61%
Eastern KingbirdTyrannidae-46%
Bank SwallowHirundinidae-44%
Barn SwallowHirundinidae-29%
Olive-sided FlycatcherTyrannidae-26%
Chimney SwiftApodidae-22%
Common NighthawkCaprimulgidae-13%
Great Crested FlycatcherTyrannidae-11%
Tree SwallowHirundinidae-6%
Least FlycatcherTyrannidae+2%
Eastern PhoebeTyrannidae+3%
Northern Rough-winged SwallowHirundinidae+19%
Yellow-bellied FlycatcherTyrannidae+52%
Eastern Whip-poor-willCaprimulgidae+130%
Eastern Wood-PeweeTyrannidae+148%
Alder FlycatcherTyrannidae+224%
Acadian FlycatcherTyrannidae+406%

Source: USGS North American Breeding Bird Survey, retrieved 2026-05-22.