BirdAnalyst
Species · Washington · BBS 2026 Release · 1966–2025

Redhead Population Trend in Washington

All statesWaterfowl

Redhead in Washington has held roughly steady: up 3% on the route-weighted index since 1977.

+3%Since 1977TrendPercent change in the route-weighted abundance index between a smoothed baseline window and the most recent one. It tracks direction, not absolute population.Full methodology →
22Routes In StateSurvey routesHow many standard-protocol BBS routes contributed counts. More routes means a steadier, better-sampled index; very thin coverage is suppressed.Full methodology →
48YearsYears surveyedNumber of years with at least one standard-protocol run in this geography. A longer record makes the trend more reliable.Full methodology →

Notable Redhead Trends in WashingtonNotable signalsLong-arc shifts the engine flags automatically — sustained declines or increases large enough to stand out from year-to-year noise.Full methodology →

No notable trend signals for Redhead in Washington. See the full index history below.

Redhead Population Forecast in Washington

If the recent trend holds, Redhead in Washington is projected to fall about 46% by 2030 — from 0.52 in 2025 to a central estimate of 0.28 (95% range 0.00–1.2). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±58.9%, with 100% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.

-46%Change by 2030TrendPercent change in the route-weighted abundance index between a smoothed baseline window and the most recent one. It tracks direction, not absolute population.Full methodology →
0.28Projected 2030 indexProjected indexThe central forecast of the abundance index if the recent trend continues. A projection of the current trajectory, not a prediction.Full methodology →
0.00–1.295% range95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →
±58.9%Backtest errorBacktest errorTypical error when we hold out the most recent years, forecast them, and compare to what actually happened. Lower means a more trustworthy projection.Full methodology →
If the recent trend holds, Redhead in Washington is projected to fall about 46% by 2030 — from 0.52 in 2025 to a central estimate of 0.28 (95% range 0.00–1.2). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±58.9%, with 100% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.19692030
Projection of the recent trend (dashed) with 80/95% bands — a projection, not a prediction. Habitat, climate, and land use are not modeled.
YearProjected indexProjected indexThe central forecast of the abundance index if the recent trend continues. A projection of the current trajectory, not a prediction.Full methodology →95% low95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →95% high95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →
20260.320.001.3
20270.310.001.3
20280.300.001.3
20290.290.001.3
20300.280.001.2

Redhead Survey Routes in Washington

Routes recording Redhead in Washington.
Recent countThe raw number of individuals recorded on this route in its most recent survey year. A single-route tally, not a trend.Full methodology →
Othello3019911982
Columbia Nwr2020211992
Ewan 21820252025
Brewster1220181978
Moses Lake1220221977
Wilbur1020051984
Harrington819801980
Tonasket620181983
Turnbull Nwr520231993
Keystone520251994
Moses Coulee420231996
Malden320052005
Odessa319931993
Twisp220042004
Reardan220091969
Wapato219941983
Cusick220251997
Connell119971994
Asotin119901990
Ewan119991991
Potholes120172017
Mesa119951995

Redhead Population Trend in Other States

alaskaarizonacaliforniacoloradoidahoiowakansasmichiganminnesotamontananebraskanevadanew-mexiconew-yorknorth-dakotaoklahomaoregonsouth-dakotatexasutahwisconsinwyoming

Source: USGS North American Breeding Bird Survey, retrieved 2026-08-14.