Guild · Colorado · BBS 2025 Release · 1966–2024

Aerial Insectivores In Colorado

23 species in this guild. As a group they are -24%Guild trendA mean-index aggregate across the species in this group — the structural direction of the guild, with individual-species noise smoothed out.Full methodology → since 1970.

Guild SignalsNotable signalsLong-arc shifts the engine flags automatically — sustained declines or increases large enough to stand out from year-to-year noise.Full methodology →

No notable trend signals for aerial insectivores in Colorado. See the full index history below.

Aerial Insectivores In Colorado Population Forecast

If the recent trend holds, Aerial insectivores in Colorado is projected to stay roughly flat through 2029, near 2.7 (95% range 1.4–3.9). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±25.8%, with 100% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.

If the recent trend holds, Aerial insectivores in Colorado is projected to stay roughly flat through 2029, near 2.7 (95% range 1.4–3.9). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±25.8%, with 100% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.19682029
Projection of the recent trend (dashed) with 80/95% bands — a projection, not a prediction. Habitat, climate, and land use are not modeled.
YearProjected indexProjected indexThe central forecast of the abundance index if the recent trend continues. A projection of the current trajectory, not a prediction.Full methodology →95% low95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →95% high95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →
20252.81.54.0
20262.71.54.0
20272.71.54.0
20282.71.44.0
20292.71.43.9

Member Species In Colorado

Aerial insectivores species in Colorado.
TrendPercent change in the route-weighted abundance index between a smoothed baseline window and the most recent one. It tracks direction, not absolute population.Full methodology →
Chimney SwiftApodidae-82%
Eastern KingbirdTyrannidae-75%
Willow FlycatcherTyrannidae-61%
Bank SwallowHirundinidae-54%
Barn SwallowHirundinidae-47%
Northern Rough-winged SwallowHirundinidae-43%
Olive-sided FlycatcherTyrannidae-40%
Cliff SwallowHirundinidae-32%
Common PoorwillCaprimulgidae-16%
Eastern PhoebeTyrannidae-9%
Cassin's KingbirdTyrannidae-8%
Western KingbirdTyrannidae-7%
Purple MartinHirundinidae+15%
Western Wood-PeweeTyrannidae+25%
Say's PhoebeTyrannidae+30%
Tree SwallowHirundinidae+40%
Violet-green SwallowHirundinidae+46%
Common NighthawkCaprimulgidae+83%
White-throated SwiftApodidae+244%
Hammond's FlycatcherTyrannidae+390%
Gray FlycatcherTyrannidae+435%
Dusky FlycatcherTyrannidae+557%
Ash-throated FlycatcherTyrannidae+839%

Source: USGS North American Breeding Bird Survey, retrieved 2026-05-22.