BirdAnalyst
Species · BCR 19 · BBS 2025 Release · 1966–2024

Redhead In Central Mixed Grass Prairie

All regionsCentral Mixed Grass PrairieWaterfowl

Redhead in Central Mixed Grass Prairie has collapsed: down 79% on the route-weighted index since 1969.

-79%Since 1969TrendPercent change in the route-weighted abundance index between a smoothed baseline window and the most recent one. It tracks direction, not absolute population.Full methodology →
16Routes In RegionSurvey routesHow many standard-protocol BBS routes contributed counts. More routes means a steadier, better-sampled index; very thin coverage is suppressed.Full methodology →
50YearsYears surveyedNumber of years with at least one standard-protocol run in this geography. A longer record makes the trend more reliable.Full methodology →

Notable SignalsNotable signalsLong-arc shifts the engine flags automatically — sustained declines or increases large enough to stand out from year-to-year noise.Full methodology →

long arc declinecomputed indexTrend sourceWhether the figure is our own computed route-weighted index or an official USGS modeled estimate. The current build labels every trend as computed.Full methodology →

Redhead has collapsed in Central Mixed Grass Prairie: down 79% on the route-weighted index since 1969.

Forecast

If the recent trend holds, Redhead in Central Mixed Grass Prairie is projected to stay roughly flat through 2029, near 0.11 (95% range 0.00–0.50). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±105.3%, with 80% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.

n/aChange by 2029TrendPercent change in the route-weighted abundance index between a smoothed baseline window and the most recent one. It tracks direction, not absolute population.Full methodology →
0.11Projected 2029 indexProjected indexThe central forecast of the abundance index if the recent trend continues. A projection of the current trajectory, not a prediction.Full methodology →
0.00–0.5095% range95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →
±105.3%Backtest errorBacktest errorTypical error when we hold out the most recent years, forecast them, and compare to what actually happened. Lower means a more trustworthy projection.Full methodology →
If the recent trend holds, Redhead in Central Mixed Grass Prairie is projected to stay roughly flat through 2029, near 0.11 (95% range 0.00–0.50). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±105.3%, with 80% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.19672029
Projection of the recent trend (dashed) with 80/95% bands — a projection, not a prediction. Habitat, climate, and land use are not modeled.
YearProjected indexProjected indexThe central forecast of the abundance index if the recent trend continues. A projection of the current trajectory, not a prediction.Full methodology →95% low95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →95% high95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →
20250.120.000.51
20260.120.000.50
20270.110.000.50
20280.110.000.50
20290.110.000.50

Routes In Central Mixed Grass Prairie

Routes recording Redhead in Central Mixed Grass Prairie.
Recent countThe raw number of individuals recorded on this route in its most recent survey year. A single-route tally, not a trend.Full methodology →
AlbertKANSAS412019
StrattonNEBRASKA142015
KennedyNEBRASKA92008
ArthurNEBRASKA92023
HamptonNEBRASKA62019
BrownleeNEBRASKA42016
Piester LakeNEBRASKA32023
Wheeler CoNEBRASKA32024
BelvidereNEBRASKA21973
TableNEBRASKA22003
NenzelNEBRASKA22019
BassettNEBRASKA22019
CoatsKANSAS11987
Swan LakeNEBRASKA12022
GordonNEBRASKA12019
Crescent LkNEBRASKA12013

Source: USGS North American Breeding Bird Survey, retrieved 2026-05-22.