Species · BCR 5 · BBS 2026 Release · 1966–2025

Gray-cheeked Thrush In Northern Pacific Rainforest

Gray-cheeked Thrush in Northern Pacific Rainforest has collapsed: down 82% on the route-weighted index since 1985.

Notable SignalsNotable signalsLong-arc shifts the engine flags automatically — sustained declines or increases large enough to stand out from year-to-year noise.Full methodology →

Gray-cheeked Thrush has collapsed in Northern Pacific Rainforest: down 82% on the route-weighted index since 1985.

Gray-cheeked Thrush In Northern Pacific Rainforest Population Forecast

If the recent trend holds, Gray-cheeked Thrush in Northern Pacific Rainforest is projected to fall about 86% by 2030 — from 0.14 in 2025 to a central estimate of 0.02 (95% range 0.00–0.40). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±59.1%, with 100% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.

If the recent trend holds, Gray-cheeked Thrush in Northern Pacific Rainforest is projected to fall about 86% by 2030 — from 0.14 in 2025 to a central estimate of 0.02 (95% range 0.00–0.40). A 5-year backtest shows a typical error of ±59.1%, with 100% of held-out values landing inside the 95% band.19832030
Projection of the recent trend (dashed) with 80/95% bands — a projection, not a prediction. Habitat, climate, and land use are not modeled.
YearProjected indexProjected indexThe central forecast of the abundance index if the recent trend continues. A projection of the current trajectory, not a prediction.Full methodology →95% low95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →95% high95% rangeThe 95% uncertainty band around the projection at the forecast horizon. The true value should land inside it most of the time.Full methodology →
20260.060.000.44
20270.050.000.43
20280.040.000.42
20290.030.000.41
20300.020.000.40

Routes In Northern Pacific Rainforest

Routes recording Gray-cheeked Thrush in Northern Pacific Rainforest.
Recent countThe raw number of individuals recorded on this route in its most recent survey year. A single-route tally, not a trend.Full methodology →
Copper RiverALASKA322011
Thompson PasALASKA92025
CordovaALASKA52022
SewardALASKA31984
Mitkof IsleALASKA22002
HyderALASKA22000
JuneauALASKA12023
Sheep MtnALASKA12025
Moose PassALASKA11983
HopeALASKA12016
Harlequin L.ALASKA12019
Chichagof IsALASKA12015
Stikine RiverALASKA12018

Source: USGS North American Breeding Bird Survey, retrieved 2026-08-14.